Legal Opinion

Browning-Ferris MacHinery Co. v. Thomson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1932No. 1370PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding was instituted by relator, Browning-Ferris Machinery Company, a corporation, against respondents, W. S. Thomson and H. E. Fitzgerald, their attorneys, Eloyd Kerr and Douis D. Gayer, and die Honorable O. L. Parish, judge of the district court in and for the one hundred nineteenth judicial district of the state of Texas, to prohibit and restrain respondents, and each of them, from assailing the validity or interfering with the enforcement of a certain judgment recovered by relator against respondents Thomson and Fitzgerald in the district court of Dallas county which judgment on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ShepherdTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Conley v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Houston v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Milam County Oil Mill Co. v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Palestine v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Elder v. Byrd-Frost, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Citizens State Bank of Frost v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Adams v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API