Legal Opinion

Michiana Shores Estates, Inc. v. Robbins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1939No. Docket Nos. 40, 41, Calendar Nos. 40,456, 40,457PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, C. J.

Upon dismissal of Michiana Shores Estates, Inc., as coplaintiff, the Long Beach Company became the sole complainant in two suits to enforce certain restrictions on lots located in subdivision 3 of Michiana Shores. One was brought against Florence Eobbins, as owner of lot 9 in block 18, and against Isadore Zeplovitz, her father and agent; the other, involving restrictions on an adjoining lot 8, joins Gertrude Zeplovitz, a co-owner, as an additional defendant. The two lots are situated in New Buffalo township, Berrien county, Michigan, in a subdivision lying close to the Michigan-Indiana…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Killian v. GoodmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Longton v. StedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McNair v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kerns v. KernsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Serbinoff v. DukasMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Scott v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API