Legal Opinion

Killian v. Goodman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This bill was filed to enjoin the erection of a 33-family apartment house which the plaintiffs claim is in violation of certain building restrictions. The district in question is known as Mills subdivision No. 4, in the city of Detroit. It was platted in 1912. The plat contains no building restrictions. All of the plaintiffs own property on Helen avenue in this subdivision. The defendant Goodman bought lot 41 and a part of lot 42, located at the southeast corner of Helen and Stuart avenues, with the intention of building a 33-family apartment house. He says that there are no building…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. James v. IrvineMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Oliver v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Rosenzweig v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Kelman v. SingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Putnam v. ErnstMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API