Legal Opinion
Schleicher v. Wendt
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 12, 2007No. 1:02-cv-1332-DFH-TABPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
DAVID F. HAMILTON, United States District Judge.
In their second amended complaint, plaintiff Franz Schleicher and others who purchased securities issued by Conseco, Inc. have sued four senior executives of the company for securities fraud between April 24, 2001, and August 9, 2002 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiffs dismissed their claims against Conseco itself after the company obtained relief through bankruptcy in 2003. Plaintiffs accuse the individual defendants of violating sections 10(b) and 20(a)…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 719 Pension Fund v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
- Bartesch v. CookDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- HUNTER v. ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Toft v. Harbor Diversified IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025