Leach v. Pierce
California Supreme Court
Mandamus to the judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County to compel settlement of a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel respondent to consider petitioner’s proposed bill of exceptions, and the proposed amendments thereto attached, and to settle the same. An alternative writ was issued, and the respondent has appeared and objected to the sufficiency of the petition,— has orally demurred to it, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief sought by her.
The facts alleged, and upon which the petitioner claims the right to have a bill of exceptions settled, are as follows: In November, 1886, Maria A. Burton, widow of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re the Estate of HertemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Leach v. AitkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Careaga v. FernaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by17 opinions
- Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In Re Estate of FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Carter v. WasteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.