In re the Estate of Herteman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling the accounts of an administrator, from a decree of distribution, and from an order refusing to act upon a motion for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
— This is an appeal by E. Chaquette, administrator of the estate, from an order settling his final account, from the decree of distribution, and from an order refusing to act upon the administrator’s motion for a new trial.
The partiqular items of the account with respect to which appellant contends that the court erred are these: 1. The item of $415 charged by appellant as money paid to a partner of the deceased to cover loss in running a hotel, and disallowed by the court. Whether such a charge could be allowed under any circumstances it is not necessary to decide, because there was no…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In Re Estate of FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Leach v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re Eakins' Estate v. EakinsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.