Legal Opinion

Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1994No. B075740PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiffs Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles and Equal Rights Congress of Los Angeles, unincorporated associations, and Gwendolyn Cannon appeal from an order denying their petition for writ of mandate. 1

In their petition, plaintiffs sought to compel defendants Los Angeles Unified School District (District) and Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles (Board) to set aside the certification of the subsequent environmental impact report (SEIR) for the planned construction of an elementary school, “Jefferson 3,” at a site in a low-income minority…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Preserve Wild Santee v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Clover Valley Foundation v. City of RocklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API