Legal Opinion
Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 2011No. H036310PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This CEQA1 case arises from a proposal to expand a medical campus in the City of Sunnyvale (City). The Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) proposed to demolish one existing medical office building, a parking lot, and *1557three single-family residences, and replace them with a larger medical office building, a parking garage, and a storage and waste management area. After preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) concerning PAMF’s proposed project and considering public comments, in June 2009 the City of Sunnyvale City Council (city…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens Against Airport Pollution v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.