Lord v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, Kelly, J., presiding, setting aside a judgment as to the applicant Harriet T. Hawkins, and giving her leave to defend the action. Her application was opposed, and this appeal is taken, by Wm. F. Sei-ier and W. 0. Musser, who, on February o, 1887, more than one year after entry of the judgment, purchased from the plaintiff a portion of the lands in controversy in the action.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
This was an action under the statute to deter» mine adverse claims to certain real estate, brought against the de» fendant C. M. Hawkins, and “also all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real estate described in the complaint.” The summons was served by publication, with the notice of Us pendens. There being no appearance by any defendant, judgment for the plaintiff was entered October 4, 1883. June 3, 1887, Harriet T. Hawkins, upon an affidavit-stating that since 1878 she has ever been the owner in fee-simple of the real estate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Brisbin v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gray v. LawlorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. CollisMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Felts v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bausman v. TilleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.