J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Bielejeski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $668 upon two promissory notes. From an order, Roeser, J., denying its motion to open a default judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action on two promissory notes. The defendant admitted their validity and interposed counterclaims exceeding them in amount. The plaintiff did not appear at the trial. Findings were made establishing the validity of the notes and the validity of the counterclaims to an amount in excess of the notes. The 'plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion to relieve it from its default.
Issue was joined on June 14, 1919. The case was noticed for trial at a term commencing December 1, 1919.
On November 29, 1919, counsel for the defendant, evidently in confirmation of a telephonic conversation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. GurneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Slatoski v. JendroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Wheaton Flour Mills Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Slimmer v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Reed v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Meyers v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.