Legal Opinion
Jane Does I Through III v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 16, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-02398(HHK)PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II and Jane Doe III, 1 are individuals with mental retardation who receive habilitation services from the District of Columbia. Plaintiffs, by their next friends, bring this action on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, against the District of Columbia and the Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Administration (“MRDDA”). 2 Plaintiffs claim that, while they were in defendants’ care, defendants authorized non-emergency surgical procedures to be performed on them, without…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ali v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENTDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Community Housing Trust v. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Uzlyan v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Harvey v. MohammedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.