Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Mohammed
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2002-2476PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff David Harvey, Personal Representative for the Estate of Curtis Suggs, moves [276] for attorneys’ fees and costs from defendant the District of Columbia pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2). Plaintiff initially requested $1,675,946.55, plus interest to be calculated as of the time of the award. 1 The District of Columbia Opposes [282] the motion and argues that plaintiff should be awarded “no more than” $890,312.55 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
The District has also moved [281] for limited discovery…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- O Centro Espirita Beneficente União Do Vegs in U.S. v. DukeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Harvey v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Corral v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Salazar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.