Legal Opinion

Sellars v. Shaughnessy Crane Service, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 8, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRuma, J.

This is an action in tort to recover for damage to a storage silo which was allegedly caused by the defendant’s negligent operation of a crane utilized to lift and move the silo.

The defendant orally moved for a “required or directed finding” at the close of the plaintiffs case. Said motion was denied. The defendant then presented evidence and renewed its “motion for a required finding” at the conclusion of the trial. The motion was again denied. The defendant did not file Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64(b) requests for rulings of law.

Judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the amount of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Brown v. GersteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Heil v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Espinola v. Riley's Liquors, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Prophete v. PolyniceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  3. Bang v. TranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Fishman v. Paramount Cleaners & Dyers of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. LetourneauMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API