Legal Opinion
Fishman v. Paramount Cleaners & Dyers of Brockton, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided February 21, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendant, Paramount Cleaners & Dyers of Brockton, Inc. (“Paramount”), appeals from the trial judge’s denial of its “motions to dismiss” at trial and its judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Judith A. Fishman (“Fishman”), and also from the motion judge’s (Dinneen, J.) earlier denial of its motion to remove the case to Superior Court. We affirm both decisions.
*34 I. Denial of Motions for Involuntary Dismissal
We treat Paramounts motions to dismiss, made at the close of Fishman’s evidence and again at the close of all the evidence, as motions for involuntary dismissal made pursuant to Mass. R.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- H. K. Webster Co. v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Palmer v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Viano v. PrevettMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. LetourneauMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Rosano-Davis, Inc. v. SastreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004