Legal Opinion

Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. Letourneau

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 19, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, P.J.

At a bench trial, defendant Ray Letourneau (“Letourneau”) moved for a “directed verdict” at the close of the evidence of plaintiff Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, Inc. (“Hallsmith”). The motion was allowed. The trial judge should have treated the motion as one for a Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 41(b) (2), involuntary dismissal and made written findings. As that was not done and as the evidence was not insufficient as a matter of law to permit a finding in its favor, we vacate the allowance of Letourneau’s “directed verdict” motion and return the case for a new trial.

Hallsmith, a wholesale food…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance v. SuttonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Prophete v. PolyniceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Sugarman v. MalkemusMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baillargeon v. Kazanjians Garage, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API