Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, LLC v. Letourneau
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, P.J.
At a bench trial, defendant Ray Letourneau (“Letourneau”) moved for a “directed verdict” at the close of the evidence of plaintiff Hallsmith-Sysco Food Services, Inc. (“Hallsmith”). The motion was allowed. The trial judge should have treated the motion as one for a Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 41(b) (2), involuntary dismissal and made written findings. As that was not done and as the evidence was not insufficient as a matter of law to permit a finding in its favor, we vacate the allowance of Letourneau’s “directed verdict” motion and return the case for a new trial.
Hallsmith, a wholesale food…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanover Insurance v. SuttonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- Prophete v. PolyniceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Sugarman v. MalkemusMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baillargeon v. Kazanjians Garage, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008