Legal Opinion
Churchill Meat Co. v. Brodsky
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 17, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 411-56PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
This case involves the validity and alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 2,565,245, issued on August 21, 1951 to Morris Lebovitz and assigned to plaintiff. It is described in the specification as a “Method And Means For Shaping Meats” and consists of two claims.1
The case was tried with a jury which, in response to specific questions put to it pursuant to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 49(a), 28 U.S.C.A., found the patent valid and infringed. At the close of all of the evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict in accordance with Rule 50 (b). This motion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. AgerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Churchill Meat Company, a Corporation of the State of Pennsylvania v. Michael Brodsky, Doing Business as Clifton Hydraulic Press CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- George P. Converse & Co. v. Standard Packaging Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- IN RE: VANGUARD CHESTER FUNDS LITIGATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023