Legal Opinion

Churchill Meat Company, a Corporation of the State of Pennsylvania v. Michael Brodsky, Doing Business as Clifton Hydraulic Press Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 12, 1959No. 12650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit for infringement of a patent covering a “Method and Means of Shaping Meats” resulted in judgment for the defendant, the alleged infringer, notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff. 160 F.Supp. 241. This appeal followed.

The appellant has not caused the stenographer’s notes of the testimony to be transcribed in full and included in the record on appeal. It appears to be appellant’s position that error is to be found on the face of the opinion and decision below considered in the light of the text of the patent in suit and certain other patents which the trial court considered and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Churchill Meat Co. v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. AgerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
  2. George P. Converse & Co. v. Standard Packaging Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API