Legal Opinion
Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. Ager
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 23, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 265-59PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
In this patent infringement action, the validity of United States Patent No. 2,794,375 issued to Dominick and Peter DiFalco on June 4, 1957, upon application filed October 12, 1954, is placed in issue by the defendant Victor L. Ager, trading as Totowa Concrete Block Company, by way of motion for summary judgment, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56, 28 U.S.C. Plaintiff, a corporation of the State of Pennsylvania, is an assignee of the patent by assignment dated January 28, 1958. Defendant Ager asserts invalidity of the patent not only in the answer to the complaint for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mellon National Bank & Trust Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Borden Co. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cresap v. Chemplast, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
- Federal Laboratories, Inc. v. Barringer Research, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981