Legal Opinion
State v. Stewart
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1999No. 980354PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Patrick Stewart appealed from an order deferring the imposition of his sentence for making a false claim or statements to the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau. We hold the administrative remedy for making a false claim or false statements to the Bureau under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33 is a civil sanction, and therefore a subsequent criminal prosecution under that statute does not violate the double jeopardy clause of the federal constitution. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Stewart received workers compensation benefits for injuries incurred during the course of his employment in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LeppertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ParizekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.