Legal Opinion

State v. Berger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2001No. 20000174PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kenneth M. Berger appeals from a criminal judgment and order, based on his guilty plea which reserved his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge and his motion to suppress Intoxilyzer results due to an alleged violation of his statutory right to consult with counsel. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On November 11, 1999, at about 1:00 a.m., a sheriffs deputy observed a vehicle operated by Berger driving with the passenger-side tires approximately two feet over the right fog line. The deputy obtained a radar reading of 39 mph in a 55-mph speed zone.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Fargo v. StutlienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Mayo v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. State v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. PerreaultNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Turner v. R.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Eriksmoen v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API