Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Wade Renault appeals from a judgment affirming a North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau order requiring him to forfeit future benefits under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33 for willfully making material false statements in a July 1992 reapplication for benefits and in a November 1992 telephone conversation with a Bureau claims analyst. Renault argues the Bureau’s findings about those two statements are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.
I
[¶2] On January 9, 1992, Renault was injured when he fell from scaffolding during the course of his employment as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NorridNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.