Legal Opinion

Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1999No. 990167PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wade Renault appeals from a judgment affirming a North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau order requiring him to forfeit future benefits under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33 for willfully making material false statements in a July 1992 reapplication for benefits and in a November 1992 telephone conversation with a Bureau claims analyst. Renault argues the Bureau’s findings about those two statements are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶2] On January 9, 1992, Renault was injured when he fell from scaffolding during the course of his employment as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Jarvis v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. NorridNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API