Legal Opinion

Cammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1975No. 43683PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

This case considers the amount of uninsured motorist coverage available to a husband and wife insured on three separate automobile insurance liability policies issued to them on three separate vehicles by one insurer. The question presented is the meaning and the validity of the pro rata clause of the “Other Insurance” exclusion, which applies to the uninsured motorist coverage contained in each policy.

The facts are these. During their lifetimes the insureds, husband and wife, purchased three separate policies, each on a different automobile owned by them, each providing uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API