Legal Opinion

Thiringer v. American Motors Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1978No. 45454PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

We are asked to determine the priorities, as between an insurer and its insured, in the proceeds of a settlement effected by the insured with the party responsible for his injuries.

At the time of the automobile accident in which the insured (respondent/cross-appellant) was injured, he carried a policy of insurance issued by the appellant (referred to hereafter as the insurer) which, in addition to other coverage, contained a provision for "Personal Injury Protection" (PIP). Under this coverage, in the event of an accident involving the insured's automobile, the insurer agreed to pay certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. W. P. Rose Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Reyes v. BanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RitzWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Propeck v. Farmers' Mut. Ins. Ass'n of Grayson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API