Legal Opinion
State v. Burnaka
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 5, 2000No. AC 19835PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, John R. Bumaka, appeals from the trial court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, the state of Con*47necticut,1 in this interpleader action. On appeal, the defendant2 claims that the court improperly (1) granted summary judgment without allowing him to present evidence of a prior settlement between the parties and (2) rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff without deciding whether the prior settlement barred the state from recovery. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MorasciniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Smulewicz-Zucker v. ZuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010