Legal Opinion
Smulewicz-Zucker v. Zucker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 14, 2006No. AC 26824PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The plaintiff, Hedda Smulewicz-Zucker, appeals from the summary judgment rendered *421in favor of the defendant, David Zucker, her former husband. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to apply the continuing course of conduct doctrine and instead applied the statute of limitations embodied in General Statutes § 52-577, pursuant to which the court ruled that all conduct of the defendant that took place prior to November 20, 1998, was time barred, (2) concluded as a matter of law that the conduct of the defendant was not sufficiently extreme and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watts v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Byrne v. BurkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Smulewicz-Zucker v. ZuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007