Legal Opinion
Gold v. Rowland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 11, 2010No. SC 17854Published
1Opinion of the Court
994 A.2d 106 (2010)
296 Conn. 186
Ronald GOLD, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
v.
John G. ROWLAND et al.
No. 17854.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued November 20, 2008.
Decided May 11, 2010.
Linda L. Morkan, with whom were Marion B. Manzo and, on the brief, Frank F. Coulom, Jr., Richard F. Vitarelli and Andrea Donovan Napp, Hartford, for the appellants-cross appellees (named defendant and defendant state of Connecticut).
Elizabeth J. Robbin Greenspan, with whom was Matthew T. Wax-Krell, Hartford, for the appellee-cross appellant (plaintiff).
Charles L. Howard, with whom…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.