Legal Opinion

State v. Morascini

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 17, 2001No. AC 20240PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant, Anthony Morascini, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of public indecency in violation of General Statutes § 53a-186 (a) (2)1 and breach of the peace in *760violation of General Statutes § 53a-181 (a) (5).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment on an inconsistent verdict and (2) abused its discretion by allowing the state to cross-examine the defendant about specific facts concerning his prior convictions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. FlynnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. State v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. VitaleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. ChyungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. State v. DamatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API