Legal Opinion
Pecan v. Madigan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2006No. AC 26607PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Pecan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants Perry Madigan and Andre Dumas. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted Madigan’s and Dumas’ motion to strike. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff allegedly suffered injuries when he slipped and fell on property owned by the housing authority of the town of East Hartford (housing authority) on January 16, 2001. On May 6, 2002, the plaintiff filed a complaint alleging negligence by the housing authority, which was named as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Egri v. FoisieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Fantasia v. Milford Fastening SystemsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Izzo v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Kleinman v. ChapnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Tremont Public Advisors, LLC v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2007
- Izzo v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.