Izzo v. Quinn
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*317MULLINS, J.
*632The defendant, Richard Quinn,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his four count counterclaim against the plaintiff, Benedetto Izzo, doing business as New Haven Drywall.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in dismissing his counterclaim on the ground that he had failed to join an indispensable or necessary party. We agree, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
*633The following undisputed facts and procedural history inform our decision. The plaintiff, acting under the name "Benedetto Izzo dba New Haven Drywall," filed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- George v. St. Ann's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duso v. GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Gen. Linen Serv. Co. v. Cedar Park Inn & Whirlpool SuitesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Cocchia v. TestaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- General Linen Service Co. v. Cedar Park Inn & Whirlpool SuitesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018