Legal Opinion

Egri v. Foisie

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 8, 2004No. AC 23738PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, Benjamin J. Egri, appeals from the judgment of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. At issue is whether a motion to dismiss is the proper procedural vehicle by which to challenge the plaintiffs pleadings. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case to that court for further proceedings.

The relevant facts are as follows. On June 6, 1999, Michael R. Foisie, an employee of the department of environmental protection (department), was operating a motor vehicle owned by the state of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API