Legal Opinion
Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 3, 2006No. AC 25728PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Rhonda L. Bross, acting in her capacity as conservatrix of the estate of Ross A. Cox, Jr., appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Hillside Acres, Inc., after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to strike her second amended complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the second amended complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history and relevant facts, taken from the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Chiulli v. ZolaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Datto Inc. v. BrabandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Pecan v. MadiganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Stuart v. FreibergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.