Legal Opinion
Marriage of Cronin v. Cronin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1985No. C7-85-533PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Both Sandra and James Cronin appeal a judgment and decree entered in their dissolution action. Sandra disputes the trial court’s property division. Both parties dispute the trial court’s maintenance award. We affirm and remand for entry of an amended judgment changing the date on which maintenance is to commence to January 1, 1985.
FACTS
Sandra and James Cronin were married in 1962. During their 22-year marriage, they had four children, two of whom are still minors. James was granted custody of both minor children. Sandra was 45 at the time of the dissolution trial and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Appollo v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buckl v. BucklSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Falk v. Hecker (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Levinson Through Levinson v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Marriage of Melina v. MelinaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Buckl v. BucklSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.