Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Flagg

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 19, 2005No. AC 24460PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiff Kathleen Duffy 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Julie S. Flagg and Crescent Street Ob-Gyn. 2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that she is entitled to a new trial because the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion in limine to preclude evidence regarding Flagg’s past experience with a procedure known as vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), which precluded the plaintiff from introducing evidence that she was not given adequate informed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Howard v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Pedersen v. VahidySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alan Andersen v. Sohit Khanna and Iowa Heart CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Curran v. BuserNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Duffy v. FlaggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. DeGennaro v. TandonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Farrell v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API