Duffy v. Flagg
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiff Kathleen Duffy 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Julie S. Flagg and Crescent Street Ob-Gyn. 2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that she is entitled to a new trial because the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion in limine to preclude evidence regarding Flagg’s past experience with a procedure known as vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), which precluded the plaintiff from introducing evidence that she was not given adequate informed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Howard v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Pedersen v. VahidySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alan Andersen v. Sohit Khanna and Iowa Heart CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Curran v. BuserNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Duffy v. FlaggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- DeGennaro v. TandonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Farrell v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.