Legal Opinion
DeGennaro v. Tandon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 2005No. AC 25104PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Rajula Tandon, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the juiy’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Natalie DeGennaro, in this dental malpractice action. The defendant claims that the court improperly denied her motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that she (1) failed to inform the plaintiff of all the material risks of the procedure at issue and (2) was negligent because the plaintiff did not present expert testimony on the standard of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Howard v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- D.A.B. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duffy v. FlaggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Green v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Spears v. ElderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Midler v. BenjaminConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Poremba v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.