Legal Opinion

Curran v. Buser

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2006No. S-04-1303PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Appellants, Matthew Curran and Emily Curran, sued Matthew’s surgeon, appellee, Kerrey B. Buser, for medical malpractice, because of complications arising after Buser removed Matthew’s gallbladder. Before Matthew’s surgery, the Department of Health and Human Services Regulation and Licensure disciplined Buser for “unprofessional conduct” and restricted his surgical privileges for 1 year. Nine days after the year had passed, Buser operated on Matthew. The Currans sued Buser, alleging both negligence and lack of informed consent. The Currans wanted to introduce evidence of Buser’s disciplinary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arato v. AvedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Funke v. FieldmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Johnson Ex Rel. Adler v. KokemoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Duttry v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Eccleston v. ChaitNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re Estate of ClingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Worth v. KolbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Watson v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API