Legal Opinion

Somersette v. . Stanaland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

If the evidence in a case is conflicting the trial judge cannot direct a verdict in favor of the party upon whom rests the burden of proof; but if the facts are admitted or established and only one inference can be drawn from them the judge may “draw the inference and so direct the jury.” Reinhardt v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 785. In the .present case the instruction complained of was not in conflict with this rule.

Brown’s survey was made 14 October, 1927; his plat shows nine lots laid off and described by metes and bounds; and the road in question is represented as extending across a part of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Collins v. Asheville Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Elizabeth City v. . CommanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Irwin v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Wheeler v. Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Foster v. . AtwaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Broadway Bank v. NobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API