Legal Opinion

Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. Town of Carolina Beach

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Appellants except to tbe judgment below upon two-grounds: (1) That tbe court erred in bolding as a matter of law tbat tbe evidence taken in tbe light most favorable to plaintiffs is insufficient to make out a case to be submitted to the jury; (2) tbat tbe court erred in signing tbe judgment without finding tbe facts.

It is our opinion, and we bold, tbat tbe exceptions are untenable.

1. At tbe outset it is noted tbat tbe evidence discloses tbat defendant owns and occupies lots sold with reference to tbe original map prior to tbe change of map in 1916.

It is a settled principle tbat if tbe owner…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Collins v. Asheville Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. State v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Hughes v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Corbin v. CHEROKEE REALTY CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Foreman v. ShollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Chalkley v. Tuscaloosa County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Town of Oriental v. HenryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API