Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Lane, J., at June Term, 1915, of Meck-LENBURG. Civil action upon agreed facts. From the judgment rendered the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

BeowN, ,J.

Tbe object of this action is to enjoin defendants from closing up by buildings, stables and other obstructions a strip of land designated upon the map of Dilworth, beginning at the point at which the “Boulevard” intersects with South Boulevard and extending with the width of said “Boulevard” one hundred feet up to the C. C. and A. R. R.

It appears that the defendants purchased a body of land contiguous to the city of Charlotte and laid it out as a residential suburb called Dil-worth; that they had a map or plat made, showing all the lots and streets, which was on file in the office…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Tise v. Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Grogan v. Town of HaywardUnited States Circuit Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Lee v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Elizabeth City v. . CommanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Irwin v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API