Broadway Bank v. Noble
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
All the evidence introduced at the trial of this action, if believed by the jury, tended to show (1) that the execution of the two notes sued on by the plaintiff was procured by the fraud' of the payee, as alleged by the defendant in his answer; (2) that the plaintiff is the holder of said notes, which are in form negotiable instruments, in due course, having taken them from a prior holder in good faith, before maturity and for value, without notice of any defect or infirmity; and (3) that the defendant, as maker of the notes, is now indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $300.00, with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reinhardt v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Lipscomb v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Somersette v. . StanalandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- In Re SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- In re Will of SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wesley Ex Rel. Wesley v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Reed v. KinnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Wolfe v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Brunswick County v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Brunswick County v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.