Legal Opinion

Bittle v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 29, 1938No. 33,757PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

Plaintiff brought this common-law action for damages for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of defendants. The Shell Petroleum Corporation, defendant, interposed a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition on the assumption that the facts had been so comprehensively stated therein as to make it clear that plaintiff’s right of redress was restricted to the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act. The trial court held otherwise and overruled the demurrer. Hence this appeal.

From the allegations of the petition, which extends to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Purkable v. Greenland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Pottorff v. Fidelity Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Williams v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Swader v. Kansas Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Hoffman v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API