Legal Opinion

Pottorff v. Fidelity Coal Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1912No. 17,525PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The principal issue is between the appellant, Minnie Pottorff, and the Fidelity Coal Mining Company, appellee, and arises upon a demurrer to a reply. The determination of this issue rests upon the legal effect of a written contract between the coal mining company and Barrett. This instrument contains the following provisions:

“That said Coal Company for and in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained, has this day demised, leased, turned over and delivered to the said Barrett, possession of all the underground for the extraction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Uppington v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Jones v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. McKinstry v. Guy Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API