Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. Thrasher

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1972No. Civ. 28848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRAPER, P. J.

The principal question here is whether defendant husband (herein called appellant) who dominated the management and directorship of Elk Cove Lumber Co., Inc., can be held liable to the corporation in this shareholders’ derivative action for the timing and manner of repayment by Elk of sums legally owing to Thrasher upon demand notes properly executed by the corporation.

We cannot accept appellant’s contention that, as a matter of law, the propriety of his advances to the corporation renders him immune to liability for the timing, manner and results of his compelling…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Snyder Electric Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Orchard v. CovelliDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In Re Kentucky Truck Sales, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1985
  4. Slemaker v. WoolleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Estate of GillilandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API