Legal Opinion

Slemaker v. Woolley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1989No. B033490PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

207 Cal.App.3d 1377 (1989)

255 Cal. Rptr. 532

C.M. SLEMAKER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

JOHN WOOLLEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. B033490.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 21, 1989.

COUNSEL

Sanders, Barnet, Jacobson, Goldman & Mosk, Richard M. Mosk, Bernard P. Simons, Scott L. Zimmerman, Burkley, Moore, Greenberg & Lyman and Walter R. Burkley, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

Spierer, Woodward, Denis & Furstman and Stanley T. Denis, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

ORTEGA, J. —

INTRODUCTION

This is a purported appeal from an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. California Ex Rel. Cooper v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana TheaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Ellis v. Roshei Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Tad Imuta v. Takaaki NakanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Foothill Properties v. Lyon/Copley Corona Associates, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API