People v. Deckert
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Because of the fact that no claim is made by appellant that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, it becomes unnecessary to make a statement of what was shown by the evidence produced by the prosecution other than so much thereof as may be pertinent to illustrate such points as are raised by appellant as grounds for a reversal of the judgment.
Appellant’s first specification of prejudicial error alleged by him to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. ZammoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. SicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. SpinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.