People v. Sica
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Defendants were convicted of a conspiracy to violate section 337a of the Penal Code and each subdivision thereof. They have appealed from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial on the grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law in certain rulings that occurred during the trial.
The evidence established that Chaiken and Weisbart were proprietors of a service station on North Main Street, in Los Angeles, where from time to time they were visited by defendants Joseph and Alfredo (Fred) Sica. Having suspected unlawful acts were being committed by…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. AdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.