Legal Opinion

Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1989No. 19678PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Mutual of Omaha (“Mutual”) appeals from a judgment in a nonjury trial finding it liable to Mervin and Ethna Reid (“the Reids”) for breach of a lease for office space. Mutual contends that the trial court erred in rejecting its claim that the Reids had constructively evicted Mutual and that it also erred in calculating the damages due the Reids. We affirm the judgment of liability for breach of the lease but reverse in part on the determination of damages.

In September of 1980, Mutual, as tenant, and the Reids, as landlord, entered a five-year lease agreement for office space…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API