Legal Opinion

Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. Peebles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2002No. 20001078PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice.

T1 Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. ("Brookside") seeks review of the decision of the court of appeals, Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. Peebles, 2000 UT App 314, 14 P.3d 105, (1) affirming the trial court's denial of Brookside's summary judgment motion, (2) affirming the trial court's grant of a directed verdict in favor of Sam and Harold Peebles on Brookside's unlawful detainer claim, (8) affirming the denial of attorney fees to Brookside, and (4) awarding attorney fees to the Peebles. Sam and Harold Pee-bles also seek review of the decision of the court of appeals…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API