Legal Opinion

Krusi v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1911No. 39PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York (T. D. 29482).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Collarettes designed to be sewed to women's dresses and intended to be worn about the neck were assessed for duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York as silk wearing apparel at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 390 of’ the tariff act of 1897. The importer protested that the merchandise was dutiable at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 391 as manufactures of silk, or of which silk was the component material of chief value, or at the same rate under paragraph 314 as wearing apparel, neckwear, and so forth, of cotton, or at 45 per cent ad valorem, either as manufactures…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Greatrex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API