Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAO, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case consists of two items, described on the invoice as wood hole saws and as metal hole saws, respectively.
The so-called wood hole saws were assessed with duty at 10 per centum ad valorem under item 649.49, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as interchangeable tools for hand tools or for machine tools, not suitable for cutting metal, other than hand tools or wire-drawing dies and extrusion dies for metal. The so-called metal hole saws were assessed at 21 per centum ad valorem under item 649.45, as interchangeable tools for hand tools or machine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Wanner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Sanyo Electric Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Oxford International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.