Legal Opinion
Grigsby v. Thomas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 14, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1582 (EGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner George Grigsby filed what he has labeled a petition for writ of habeas corpus on September 6, 2007. The petition names as the respondent Judge Mary Thomas. For numerous reasons, as detailed below, this Court sua sponte dismisses the petition without prejudice.
First, petitioner has styled his filing as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, he has not provided any facts suggesting that he is presently in custody nor does he allege any collateral consequence of previous incarceration that justifies his petition. See Qassim v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Stokes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. AllenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- GILLIS v. SALDANADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022
- Harbison v. BeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hunter v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- John Randall Futch v. Grand Performer Inc. d/b/a JW Marriott SavannahDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.